¡Hola 张! El 2018-06-07 a las 03:15 +0000, 张 敬强 escribió:
Please consider add dbus-user-session as alternative for dbus-x11. Or just use dbus-session-bus as dependency.Still no pending action?
Does it make any difference? What's the rationale behind this request?dbus-x11's dbus-launch is explicitly used by upstream's unittests, iirc, that's the main reason why the dbus-x11 dependency is present. It could probably be dropped (and added to the testsuite dependencies).
dbus-session-bus is a virtual package, which is also provided by dbus, so that's most likely going be fulfilled by dbus if used as a dependency, also dependencies against virtual packages need to be given a non virtual preference. Probably depending on: dbus | dbus-session-bus would work.
But breaking the session dbus for our users wouldn't be nice so this needs a somewhat thorough testing, in an enviroment with only dbus installed, with only dbus-user-session installed, with only dbus-x11 installed, etc, checking for differences in each session.
If you do this, please open a merge request in salsa. Happy hacking, -- "Las computadoras son inútiles, solo pueden darte respuestas." -- Pablo Picasso Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
