Emilio, Seb,
Can you confirm that now that we have a) "green light" on the transition, and b) the r-base package is in unstable we should see binary: any packages being rebuilt -- which I do not yet see. When will this start? On 31 May 2018 at 05:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 31 May 2018 at 09:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | | On 31/05/18 00:13, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | | > On 30 May 2018 at 23:40, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | | > | curl migrated to testing today. Please go ahead with R 3.5. | | > | | > Yay!! Thank you -- and r-base_3.5.0-3 is now in incoming awaiting inclusion | | > into unstable. | | | | Cool, it's almost built everywhere now. | | | | There are a few architectures where it can't built due to openjdk though. | | I see you changed the build-dependency to: | | | | openjdk-10-jdk | default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] | | Yes, that was the most recent bug report on it to reflect Java 10. | | | The buildds only take into account the first alternative, but since they don't | | have openjdk-10 they can't build r-base. One option is to put the architecture | | list in the first part, e.g. by swapping the order: | | | | default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] | openjdk-10-jdk | | | | default-jdk defaults to openjdk-10 in most architectures, so that's fine. | | It will also help with m68k which defaults to openjdk-9 at the moment (I | | guess it will be updated once openjdk-10 is bootstrapped there). | | | | Can you update that? | | Very interesting. That had never been suggested. I will give that shot. | The r-cran-rjava package will need it too. Uploaded as r-base_3.5.0-4 We have the annual "R in Finance" conference I co-organize for its 10th year this weekend so I likely won't get to manual uploads of binary: all packages for a few days. Dirk | Dirk | | | Thanks, | | Emilio | | -- | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
