Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hello Ian,
Ian Jackson [2018-05-15 14:44 +0100]: > These names are part of an external interface. It is not very > friendly to just remove them them. > > This is particularly true because other programs have an expectation > that they can have the user specify `foo' and then run `adt-virt-foo' > from PATH. Do you have examples of such "expectations"? These were deprecated two years ago (with warning messages) and removed one year ago, with a NEWS and blogs and emails and all that. I haven't seen any bug reports or otherwise from any user that asked for bringing them back; this is the first one. Why now? Introducing these long-obsolete aliases again after they already got dropped in a stable release seems just unnecessary effort to me. Martin
