Hi Mattia, > That was my initial idea as well, but apparently the Python developers > are of different opinion. Check out the PEP I linked in my previous > email: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0383/
Ah, thanks I merely skimmed this one and not the the issue. Hey, the Python developers could be wrong — they didn't like the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patches! > > please include my testcase (or something based on it) that I added in: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/898022#5 > > Of course. (Cool, just checking you saw it as, of course, there was no initial "patch" tag) Nice work :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
