Nicholas,
> Continuing from #883218. Strictly speaking I think this might be a
> ยง4.9 "clean (required)" Policy violation and should be priority
> "serious", but I'd like to keep it as "important" until
I fear looking up the exact Policy reference, writing this mail and
additionally providing a justification to why you chose a particular
level seems a little add odds time and energy-wise for a one-line fix
to a package, no? :)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
