>>>>> "IJ" == Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: IJ> That doesn't seem to be an answer to Sean's question. Why do you want IJ> the question of redundant dependencies dealt with in policy ? What IJ> bad things are happening, or might be likely to happen, because it is IJ> not mentioned ? Because I want to know if it is wrong or not. If it is wrong then I will tell the person who did it it is wrong when I see it. If it is not wrong, then I will keep my mouth shut.
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: Depe... Sean Whitton
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing:... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double list... Bill Allombert
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double ... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly dou... Bill Allombert
- Bug#809383: mention explicitl... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double list... Ian Jackson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double ... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly dou... Ian Jackson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing:... Russ Allbery