>>>>> "IJ" == Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
IJ> That doesn't seem to be an answer to Sean's question.  Why do you want
IJ> the question of redundant dependencies dealt with in policy ?  What
IJ> bad things are happening, or might be likely to happen, because it is
IJ> not mentioned ?
Because I want to know if it is wrong or not.
If it is wrong then I will tell the person who did it it is wrong when I
see it.
If it is not wrong, then I will keep my mouth shut.

Reply via email to