On 2018-02-28 23:38:44 [+0100], Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Hello, Hi,
> We need support in this package for RISC-V, to bootstrap the riscv64 > architecture. Please be aware that we plan to get rid of this. > I am attaching a patch that allowed me to cross-compile the package. I am not > completely sure if all of the options are the most correct or the best choice > (more optimised), for example I used DES_RISC2 because the MIPS family uses > those and it's probably the closest to RISC-V, so it's my best-guess. But if > you spot something fishy, please tell. for the reason above I would care too much about this package on your side. Make sure the test suite passes and you should be good. > It would be great if you could include these changes and release a new version > for unstable. There should be a new upstream version this week. This change should be part of it. > If we can do something to speed-up this process, please let me/us know. I do accept a bribe. Sebastian
