Package: rosegarden4 Severity: wishlist
Your package hacks the source to change rosegarden, rosegardenrc, ~/.kde/share/apps/rosegarden, etc. into rosegarden4. You probably do this to avoid breaking the old Rosegarden, if both packages are installed concurrently. It's not a bad thing, but if you're going to do this, why not go the last mile and rename the sequencer too? If the Debian package had the sequencer renamed, then it would be possible to run the last stable version from a package while running the current SVN version installed in the usual place in /usr. That would be convenient, and it's probably a small thing to do, since you're already hacking the package source anyway. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
