Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Norbert,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:20:44PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I am not sure what part of the whole system is just messed up, but it
> is. Today I uploaded texlive-{base,lang,extra,bin} and biber, all in the
> same dput call.
Please don't assume that the system is broken.
Today, like any other day, thousands of uploads were processed just
fine, just to prove that the system is not broken.
It's *far* more likely that something you did was not ok.
> texlive-lang was cryptically rejected because whoever claimed that
> texlive-lang-japanese was missing, which wasn't. At least dput told me
> that it did upload it.
Please report the *exact* error message, together with your .changes
and .dsc (if any). Without it's pretty useless for anybody to speculate
what went wrong.
If I had to speculate on something it would be about Packages-List not
containing the package, but who knows.
> Then, after a few hours, I re-uploaded texlive-lang, only to get a very
> helpful message that I have to change the timestamp of the package for
> reupload.
>
> I refrain from uttering my opinion, but I expect that I can upload a
> package that has not been accepted into Debian, and that the timestamp
> should not be a limiting factor.
DAK refuses to process the very same signature twice, to prevent replay
attacks and similar stuff.
Just resign the .changes, no need to change anything else.
https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/blob/master/daklib/checks.py#L113
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
