On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote: > But the lintian stuff I complained about is not completly fixed, there > is even a new tag: > I: gudhi source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-external-doc- > resources.patch > > Please run lintian after every build! Best, include it into pbuilder or > like! Remember "some sponsors are evil and pedantic [1] when running > lintian. > > [1] https://nthykier.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/some-sponsors-are-evil-a > nd-pedantic/
Ah, I'm sorry; I had accidentally run lintian too unpedantically and with an older version. I've adopted your suggested routine now. Thanks a lot! Some comments/questions on other lintian messages follow. > I: gudhi source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" > in package gudhui Since there's nothing inherent about one of the binary packages being in the same section as the source, I think it should be OK to keep this as is. Does that seem OK? > P: gudhi source: file-contains-trailing-whitespace debian/control (line > 110) Fixed. > P: gudhi source: package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 10 Fixed. > I: gudhi source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-external-doc- > resources.patch Fixed. > W: gudhi source: unnecessary-testsuite-autopkgtest-field Fixed. > I: python3-gudhi: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/python3/dist- > packages/gudhi.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so ment meant > I: python3-gudhi: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/python3/dist- > packages/gudhi.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so preambule preamble > I: python3-gudhi: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/python3/dist- > packages/gudhi.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so choosen chosen I'd prefer to consider these upstream bugs. I can report them, but I guess it's OK to leave these minor things unpatched? > W: libgudhi-examples: lib-recommends-documentation recommends: > libgudhi-doc I think this is a false report; libgudhi-examples is in fact not a library package. > I: libgudhi-doc: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration Fixed. > I: gudhui: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/gudhui preambule preamble See above. > P: gudhui: no-upstream-changelog Upstream doesn't supply one. > W: gudhui: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gudhui This is a GUI tool without an upstream manpage. Should I make a stub one? > Please review d/copyright. I found at least one undocumented file which > is licensed Apache 2.0 and another one under LGPL3+. Neither are in > d/copyright. I'm looking into this, and will get back to you. Best, Gard
