Either version of busybox should be fine. Prefer “busybox” unless you have a reason to use the static variant.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Geert Stappers <stapp...@stappers.nl> wrote: > Package: debos > Version: 1.0.0+git20180112.6e577d4-1 > > Hi, > > While testdriving debos with the rpi3 recipe was encountered > that /bin/busybox is missing > > Error in context: > | root@yanur:/src/githubclones/debos-recipes/debian/arm64/image-rpi3# > debos debimage-rpi3.yaml > | 2018/02/28 08:13:57 open failed: /bin/busybox - open /bin/busybox: no > such file or directory > | root@yanur:/src/githubclones/debos-recipes/debian/arm64/image-rpi3# > > Searching which package contains /bin/busybox > | $ apt-file search /bin/busybox > | busybox: /bin/busybox > | busybox-static: /bin/busybox > > Which one to use? > Or are both fine? > > > Groeten > Geert Stappers > -- > Leven en laten leven > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list > pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers > -- Best regards, Michael
