On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 13:22 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > What's the situation with this one? Could it be included in the next > Stretch > update?
The +confirmed and "... then OK" in my mail of December 2nd that you quote below was intended as an acknowledgement that you could go ahead with the upload. > On Saturday, 9 December 2017 1:33:39 PM AEDT Russell Coker wrote: > > On Saturday, 2 December 2017 11:05:24 AM AEDT Adam D. Barratt > > wrote: > > > IFF it's versioned as 2:2.20161023.1-9+deb9u1, uses "stretch" as > > > the > > > changelog distribution, is otherwise identical to the diff > > > presented in > > > this bug log and is built and tested on a stretch system, then > > > OK. > > > > I've attached a debdiff that only differs in file timestamps, the > > version > > change you requested, and the changelog timestamp. > > > > I have tested it on my main mail server, one of my main web > > servers, one of > > my minor mail servers, and a shell server. It passed all tests and > > did > > everything as well as expected with no regressions. > > > > Please consider it for inclusion. > > Regards, Adam
