Control: notfound -1 0.99 Dear Serge,
2018-02-23 2:05 GMT+07:00 Goupil <goupil...@gmail.com>: > Dear Bálint, > > Sorry, i wasn't informed of thoses changes and i did not know this command > (apt-mark hold <package name>). > This modification affect the behavior of Synaptic whose 'locking' > functionality is no longer operational when this package is installed. > > I'm going to make a bug report about synaptic. > > This issue is solved. I see you found the relevant bug, #276655 in synaptic. > > Thank you very much for your time and your answer, and sorry for the > inconvenience. No problem, your email made me look at u-u code to check if it really honors the hold marker and noticed that blacklist and whitelist was not honored in auto-removal. The next upload will fix that. Cheers, Balint > > Cheers, > > Serge Le Tyrant. > > > > Le 21/02/2018 à 18:41, Bálint Réczey a écrit : >> >> Control: tags -1 moreinfo >> >> Dear Serge, >> >> 2018-02-17 22:20 GMT+07:00 Serge Le Tyrant <goupil...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Package: unattended-upgrades >>> Version: 0.99 >>> Severity: important >>> Tags: d-i >>> >>> With unattended-upgrades 0.99: All Debian packages are updated (not only >>> Debian-Security) including blocked packages >> >> Yes, this is a result of a recent intentional change to fix #597061 and >> #787945. >> >>> I don't wan't to upgrade Tellico 3.1-0.3, because the last version >>> (3.1.1-0.1) >>> has an annoying bug (sorry i don't report it). So i have blocked this >>> 3.1-0.3 >>> version on Synaptic. >> >> Unfortunately this 'locking' affect's only Synaptic. To hold a package >> for most package management interfaces please use: >> >> apt-mark hold <package name> >> >>> I hadn't this probleme before this 0.99 version (upgraded on the >>> 02.10.2018) >> >> Yes, the change took place in 0.99. >> >>> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10periodic (i never edited it) : >>> APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists "0"; >>> APT::Periodic::Unattended-Upgrade "1"; >>> APT::Periodic::Download-Upgradeable-Packages "1"; >>> APT::Periodic::AutocleanInterval "0"; >>> >>> If i understand Debian Wiki correctly : >>> APT::Periodic::Download-Upgradeable-Packages "1" mean Do "apt-get upgrade >>> --download-only" so unattended-upgrades must only download upgradable >>> packages, >>> and not to update all the system, and let alone update blocked packets. >> >> No, this option is documented in /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily and >> controls only the interval packages are downloaded. >> >>> This can cause a severe malfunction of my system if I dont want to update >>> a >>> kernel or a library whose top version does not work >> >> Please use the apt-mark hold <package name> command to lock packages >> and u-u will honor that. You can also choose set >> Unattended-Upgrade::Package-Blacklist, but that affects >> unattended-upgrades only and not for example apt-get dselect-upgrade. >> >> Cheers, >> Balint >> >
