Hi Mattia,
> So, is this commit challenging the idea of dpkg-buildpackage being
> optional
No. This change attempts to make no comment on whether dpkg-buildpackage
should be mandatory or optional. As you imply from the question, Lintian
would not be the place to push that. :)
It intends that developers use the cleaner and more-standard:
> include /u/s/d/pkg-info.mk
.. instead of some self-rolled parsing of dpkg-parsechangelog or
similar.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
