On 27/02/2006 6:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Julien Goodwin: > >> This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. >> Ref: >> http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977 > > This page doesn't mention version 0.79 at all. Why do you think it's > been fixed in our 0.79 version?
From the linked page: > The SELinux version of PAM before 0.78r3 As I'm not entirely sure of debian's version number handling saying 0.79 is just easier. Commit: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/pam/Linux-PAM/NEWS?rev=1.6&view=markup
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
