On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 the mental interface of Yaroslav Halchenko told: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > How did you build the Debian package? It builds fine with > > apt-src build > dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us > after I applied some changes :-)
Changes we don't maintain then ;) > > No! It builds with db.h or without. > hm... what about db.h of previous version (as it was with me at the > beginning)? Should be the same. > > > to "configure" then it might lead to unhandled dependencies like > > > in the case with me since I had older version of bdb. > > No need to. mutt-ng uses qdbm by default. Again, it builds with or > > without any version of libdb-dev installed. > apparently it did not at that moment, BUT it does now - I mean that it > builds ok at the moment. I am not sure > what was the status of the packages yesterday and how it was different > from today... I will pull out the status of the packages from yesterday's > backup and see what is really a difference -- I didn't do any major > upgrades so I should be able to catch what is the difference between > today/yesterday packages versions... Hmmm, ther must be someting strange with your system config. > > > beginning but then slowly I decided to bring it over to testing, > > > and then moved it back to unstable). > > You can make your own test and build mutt-ng with pbuilder. > no - I believe that it builds fine in pbuilder. There is something else > subtle which caused it to fail. No. Do you agree to close the bug then? Elimar -- On the keyboard of life you have always to keep a finger at the escape key;-)
pgpitVMwwKQmZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
