X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org, ballo...@debian.org, spwhit...@spwhitton.name, r...@debian.org
El dc 07 de 02 de 2018 a les 20:01 +0100, Bill Allombert va escriure: > > Versioned Recommends actually, but does a versioned Recommends make any > > difference? > > That is why a versioned Depends: is needed. A hard dependency on non-functional data makes no sense. What about a new Outdates field? It would help to warn the user about outdated documentation. El dc 07 de 02 de 2018 a les 11:13 -0800, Russ Allbery va escriure: > Then we can close this bug as unnecessary? Since the *-doc mechanism is > already specified. I cannot make libc6 depend on glibc-doc. > > I do not think so. Metadata is usually smaller than those files: > > copyright, changelog, manpages, etc. > > None of which you're addressing here except copyright. True. What suffix would you use for copyright plus changelog? -doc-minimal? > I'm fairly sure about this, but feel free to do an experiment if you > really want to check the numbers. What metadata are you thinking of? What is the test you are suggesting? El dc 07 de 02 de 2018 a les 12:25 -0700, Sean Whitton va escriure: > Either way, please X-debbugs-CC the list rather than all four of us > individually. It would not work. https://bugs.debian.org/831059
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
