Source: bisho
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:libsocialweb
Control: retitle -2 libsocialweb: Should this package be removed?
Control: block -2 by -1

libsocialweb was part of the Meego project, which is no longer maintained
upstream. Nothing in Debian unstable depends on it, except for bisho.

bisho was also part of the Meego project. From its package description, it
appears to be a configuration utility for Meego social media integration
(meaning libsocialweb?). This doesn't seem like a useful thing to have
in Debian when we don't seem to have anything that will make use of
that configuration.

I think these packages should be removed from Debian.

If you agree, please reassign these bugs to the archive administrators
with control commands similar to these:

severity xxxxxx normal
reassign xxxxxx ftp.debian.org
retitle xxxxxx RM: bisho -- RoQA; unmaintained upstream, depends on obsolete 
libraries
severity yyyyyy normal
reassign yyyyyy ftp.debian.org
retitle yyyyyy RM: libsocialweb -- RoQA; unmaintained upstream, depends on 
obsolete libraries

Conversely, if you think this package should remain in Debian, please
close this bug, and fix its RC bug(s). This would almost certainly involve
becoming its de facto upstream maintainer.

Thanks,
    smcv

Reply via email to