Sven Joachim: > On 2018-01-21 23:24 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 07:51:00PM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: >>> ... >>> The question now is: How many packages are affected by it? If it is >>> sufficiently low, it might be worth doing the clean up now to simplify >>> packaging in general. But in worst case, we will have to revert for now >>> and reintroduce this to compat 12. >> >> My current list for "builds with 11 and FTBFS with 11.1.3" is: >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/apr.html >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ck.html >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/cpputest.html >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/debian-handbook.html >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/iaxmodem.html >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/moarvm.html >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/openal-soft.html [...] >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/jscommunicator.html [...]
Indeed; all of these just have a .PHONY build target and nothing else (i.e. they won't also hit #887482 AFAICT). They all basically just want debhelper to ignore the explicit target and inline the sequence. I will dig a bit in the code >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/biojava-live.html > > This ends in > > ,---- > | dh_installdocs > | make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/1st/biojava-live-1.7.1' > | dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=binary > | dpkg-genbuildinfo: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; > .buildinfo is meaningless > | dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=binary subprocess > returned exit status 25 > `---- > > In other words, dh_installdeb was not run, apparently because there is a > broken > explicit rule for the binary-indep target. > The rule being: """ > binary-indep: build install > dh_testdir > dh_testroot > dh_installchangelogs > dh_installdocs """ So yes, that is rather incomplete. It was probably saved by #880840 previously. >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/jansson.html > > [...] > which seems to have a similar cause as #887482. > Indeed. The package uses a work around for #836699 that now triggers this issue. Let's keep the discussion for these problems in #887482. >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/scidavis.html > > Failed because 'dh_makeshlibs --no-act' returned an error. Niels might > know why this is now the case and used to be different. > > Cheers, > Sven > > [...] Bug in --no-act code; fixed in master now - thanks for spotting it. :) Thanks, ~Niels
