Quoting gregor herrmann (2018-01-22 00:03:59) > On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 20:20:21 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Quoting gregor herrmann (2018-01-21 19:38:05) > > > There doesn't seem to be a globally agreed attribution/license grant > > > for CC0-1.0. What I've used so far is: > > > > > > To the extent possible under law, the author(s) have dedicated all > > > copyright and related and neighboring rights to this software to the > > > public > > > domain worldwide. This software is distributed without any warranty. > > > . > > > On Debian systems, the complete text of the CC0 license, version 1.0, > > > can be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/CC0-1.0. > > > > The authors of CC0 recommends this text: > > > > > To the extent possible under law, the person who associated CC0 with > > > this work has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights > > > to this work. > > > > See <https://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/> (and fill in the form...) > > Yeah, been there :) > The other recommendation from Creative Commons is here:
Sorry, I lost you: What is the issue does this bugreport try to solve? You first presented a text that you personally prefer. I believe Software::License is not about personal preference, so I pointed to the official text from the authors of that license. You then point to other unofficial text (likely, but it is a wiki) from the authors of the license as well, and other texts found "in the wild". I believe Software::License should present official licenses and their officially recommended license grant. Also, I believe we should push changes upstream and *not* deviate further in the Debian fork of the Software::License - see bug#828218. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
