Hello Andreas, Sorry for the late reply.
sosreport is in fact designed to silently ignore situations where commands issued are not available. So I do thing, as you suggest, that a Recommend would be more suitable in that context. I will do my best to fix that as soon as possible. Kind regards, ...Louis 2018-01-21 9:59 GMT+01:00 Andreas Henriksson <andr...@fatal.se>: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 08:11:31PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Package: sosreport > [...] > > /usr/share/sosreport/sos/plugins/cman.py contains debugfs. According to > file it is a C++ source, ASCII text > > /usr/share/sosreport/sos/plugins/dlm.py contains debugfs. According to > file it is a C++ source, ASCII text > > /usr/share/sosreport/sos/plugins/filesys.py contains dumpe2fs. > According to file it is a C++ source, ASCII text > > /usr/share/sosreport/sos/plugins/gfs2.py contains debugfs. According to > file it is a C++ source, ASCII text > > /usr/share/sosreport/sos/plugins/kvm.py contains debugfs. According to > file it is a C++ source, ASCII text > [...] > > All the debugfs matches seems to be false positives, but filesys.py is > interesting. > > The following commands seems to be used (but I'm not sure exactly what > the impact of them missing are, if only the information will be missing > from report or complete failure): > mount, df, findmnt, lsof, dumpe2fs > > It thus looks like the package might need to add the following > dependencies: > mount, lsof, e2fsprogs > > If command failure is ok, then a recommends might be more suitable. > Would be great to hear something from the maintainer on this matter. > > Regards, > Andreas Henriksson >
