On Mon 05 Sep 2005 at 14:00:36 +0200, you wrote: > X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Debian-PR-Message: report 299229 > X-Debian-PR-Package: bash > X-Debian-PR-Keywords: > X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de (including spamassassin) > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=3 tests= > X-Spam-Level: > Resent-From: Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org > Resent-Cc: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:33:11 UTC > Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#299229: /etc/bash_completion: 'ci -u prefix<TAB>' hit on > RCS/prefix shadows ./prefix > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:25:09 +0200 > > Package: bash > Version: 2.05b-24 > Severity: normal > File: /etc/bash_completion > > If you have a file RCS/prefix1st-file,v but not RCS/prefix2nd-file,v > and want to do an initial check-in of ./prefix2nd-file, > then, if you do > ci -u prefix<TAB> > the bash completion turns it into > ci -u ./prefix1st-file > unconditionally, w/o giving you the opportunity to select the 2nd file.
It's that way by design, since this is the desired behaviour after you have performed the initial check-in, which, by definition, is only needed once. Thanks, Ian -- Ian Macdonald | Kliban's First Law of Dining: Never eat [EMAIL PROTECTED] | anything bigger than your head. http://www.caliban.org/ | | | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
