> This has also been brought up upstream in #39884 for their packages, and > is now being discussed in wine-devel
The discussion ended without a conclussion, be it for yes or for no. Upstream's packages are monolithic, though, without a separate binfmt package, thus it's a valid dilemma there. Your packaging is different. > We might also add a low priority debconf question (default false) to > setup the binfmt support. I just realized: as there's nothing that can make wine-binfmt automatically installed (the only relationships are Suggests:), this question has already been answered by the user: they made the manual step of installing this package. On Debian, it is split out, and has no other contents than the binfmt. Thus, every user who would want to answer "no" to such a debconf question wouldn't install the package. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out, ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ sky. Your cat demands food. The priority should be obvious...
