Ferenc Wágner <wf...@niif.hu> writes: > Well, that can be done. The main problem is not the lack of SCTP on > Hurd (that's an optional feature of Kronosnet), but the lack of epoll > AND kevent. So Kronosnet will probably not build on Hurd for quite some > time, I guess. I thought leaving the problem exposed was better, but if > you say otherwise, I'm happy to comply.
I generally recommend excluding clearly unsupported architectures to avoid wasting autobuilder time, but the failure is quick enough, and kronosnet's build dependencies light enough, that it's not unreasonable to leave it as is either. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
