Mattia Rizzolo writes ("Bug#886625: push-source should be usable no matter the
state of the working tree"):
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:20:08AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > (Now that push-source exists I'm not sure why you would build-source,
> > really.)
>
> To build a .dsc and then pass it to a non supported builder (which
> means, anything that is not sbuild or gbp, I think).
Right, I sort of realised that in my last message. Are these mostly
use cases where a .dsc is wanted rather than a .changes ?
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
