Control: tags -1 upstream wontfix

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:04:41 +0200 martin f krafft <madd...@debian.org>
wrote:
> Package: iproute
> Version: 20090324-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: ipv6
> 
> Given that IPv6 is becoming more and more ubiquitous (2.6.30 kernels
> in Debian have ipv6 compile in, it's no longer a module), it would
> make sense to unify the output of 'ip route' in similar ways as the
> output of 'ip address' already includes both address families.
> 
> A simple call to 'ip route' should include IPv6 routes, e.g.
> 
>   2001:a60:f069::/64 dev wifi  proto kernel  metric 256  expires
2592088sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0
>   fe80::/64 dev wifi  proto kernel  metric 256  mtu 1500 advmss 1440
hoplimit 0
>   192.168.20.0/24 dev wifi  proto kernel  scope link  src
192.168.20.102 
>   default6 via fe80::204:75ff:fecf:3ff6 dev wifi  proto
kernel  metric 1024  expires 1727sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64
>   default via 192.168.20.1 dev wifi 
> 
> In general, there won't be overlaps, and IPv4 and IPv6
> addresses/routes are sufficiently different. The only clash is with
> 'default', and I suggest that the IPv6 default route should be
> labelled 'default6'.
> 
> If -4 or -6 are explicitly specified, the output should only contain
> those address families. But if neither is specified, the two should
> be merged.

Hi,

We shouldn't diverge from upstream in this kind of behaviour, so
marking this as wontfix (just 8 years later ;-) ).

Feel free to ask for this upstream at net...@vger.kernel.org but I
strongly suspect such a change would be considered backward
incompatible, since it would probably break all the nasty screen-
scraping systems out there, so it's not likely to happen.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to