Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> writes: > On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 04:08:51PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> writes: >> > I'd go with 3. encode variant in the "family" field. >> > >> > If you look at some other fonts (better visible in a GTK2 font picker >> > rather >> > than in the GTK3 one), you can find variants usually presented as families, >> > such as "Comic Neue" vs "Comic Neue Angular". >> >> So what should be new package names?. Tell me from below which sounds >> correct. >> >> fonts-fantasque-noloopk-sans-ttf or fonts-fantasque-sans-noloopk-ttf >> >> Basically fonts-fantasque-[variant]-sans-[type] or >> fonts-fantasque-sans-[variant]-[type] > > That still wouldn't let the user pick one, unless you make the variants > conflict. > > I'm talking about SetFontNames(), not package name.
Hmm so you are talking about setting font name in the scripts instead of package name. By patching the font I assume right?. Correct me if I'm wrong. Meow,
