On 22/12/17 08:12, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12/18/2017 07:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 18/12/17 19:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 12/17/2017 11:08 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> On 12/17/2017 02:27 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>>> On 12/17/2017 10:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>>> On 15/12/17 23:11, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>>>>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>>>>> Severity: normal >>>>>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>>>>>> Usertags: transition >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.3. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.2.2 (#876561), there is no SONAME >>>>>>> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol >>>>>>> changes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 2.2.3 from >>>>>>> experimental as summarized below. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> libgdal-grass doesn't need a binNMU as the 2.2.3 version will be >>>>>>> uploaded to unstable instead. liblas likewise doesn't need a binNMU, >>>>>>> the version is experimental will be moved to unstable instead. >>>>>> >>>>>> Go ahead. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, gdal (2.2.3+dfsg-1), liblas (1.8.1-6) & libgdal-grass (2.2.3-1) >>>>> have been uploaded to unstable. >>>> >>>> gdal (2.2.3+dfsg-1) has been built & installed on all release >>>> architectures, we should be ready for the binNMUs now. >>> >>> Thanks for scheduling the binNMUs. >>> >>> Please also binNMU mapnik in experimental. >> >> mapnik and opencv binNMU'ed on experimental. > > The testing migration seems to be blocked by opencv. > > It FTBFS on various release architectures due to tesseract (#884903)> which > also triggered an uncoordinated transition.
Sigh. Yes, I noticed that. > Should we wait for autoremoval to kick in? No, opencv is a key package, so won't get autoremoved. tesseract needs fixing (and it seems that's happened, let's see how some give backs turn out). Cheers, Emilio
