Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The same discrepancy existed between config and postinst, and I have > fixed this by replacing the hardcoded value with a eperl variable. Does > it make sense to generate templates from templates.in and have eperl > replace that variable, too? Or will that make the l18n people cry out > loud because their analysis tools won't work?
I don't know. Christian, do you think the l10n people would have a problem with a templates file that is generated from templates.in at package build time? Thank you. -- Florent
