Hello James, On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 09:34:34PM +0000, James Cowgill wrote: > Control: block -1 by 882377 884252 884243 884245 884246 884247 884248 > Control: block -1 by 884249 884250 884251
Thanks for the blocks. Even though Sebastian told me in irc that he
reported these I didn't consider these blocks when reporting the
transition bug.
> > title = "libupnp";
> > is_affected = .depends ~ "libupnp6" | .depends ~ "libupnp10";
> > is_good = .depends ~ "libupnp10";
> > is_bad = .depends ~ "libupnp6";
>
> One slight issue is #882377. In pupnp 1.8.3 upstream broke the ABI which
> I pointed out to them. As a result they have bumped the SONAME in
> upstream git (not yet released). To avoid having to do two transitions,
> we should wait to use the new SONAME. Since the damage is already done,
> I guess we could use the new SONAME right now, although I am always a
> little cautious in doing that in case upstream changes something else :)
> In any case, the ben file will need to be changed at some point.
I don't know if the transition is only added to the tracker when all
blocking bugs are resolved. If not, ben could use
is_good = .depends ~ /libupnp1[01]/
(or even .depends ~ /libupnp1[0-9]/ if upstream is expected to misbehave
:-)
Best regards
Uwe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
