On 17-Dec-2017, Alf Gaida wrote:
> If you call correct behaviour a design change you are right

You have not shown any of the existing behaviour to be incorrect; you
have acknowledged that it is correct. (That is unrelated to whether
different proposed behaviour might *also* be correct.)

Instead, what you have proposed is justified not by any incorrect
behaviour of the program, but a preference between alternative
designs. So this report is a request for enhancement, since we both
agree the existing behaviour is correct.

Thanks again for describing the details.

-- 
 \             “A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest |
  `\                                       burglar.” —Henry L. Mencken |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <bign...@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to