On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:32:38PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote: >Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> writes: > >> Interestingly, in armhf mode the package builds just fine on the same >> type of hardware (built ok on hoiby). Wondering what on earth is going >> on... > >Agreed. > >For what it's worth, the only change between -4 and -5 should be this. > >diff --git a/libguile/threads.c b/libguile/threads.c >index dcbd24d91..0f688c3fb 100644 >--- a/libguile/threads.c >+++ b/libguile/threads.c >@@ -552,6 +552,7 @@ guilify_self_1 (struct GC_stack_base *base) > t.base = base->mem_base; > #ifdef __ia64__ > t.register_backing_store_base = base->reg_base; >+ t.pending_rbs_continuation = 0; > #endif > t.continuation_root = SCM_EOL; > t.continuation_base = t.base;
ACK. Adrian (in CC) was pondering if it might be a (new) toolchain issue. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com There's no sensation to compare with this Suspended animation, A state of bliss
