Hi Jeremy,
> What really happened here is that I intentionally used the original
> tarball so that the updated packaging could be synced to Ubuntu, which
> requires the original tarball to match.
>
> I don't think this is at all a DFSG violation (or if it is, it is very
> minor) since the bundled jquery.js is intentionally not included in
> the binary packages.
Thanks for the explanation and I agree on the DFSG and the lowering of
the severity, etc. so thanks for that.
As an aside, whether the code ends up in the binary packages is
irrelevant btw; we are still distributing the source.
However, I am unclear about your intended fix -- upload with an updated
Files-Excluded header or wait for a new tarball that does exclude these
files? I mean, either the Files-Excluded header or the orig tarball is
incorrect at the moment, right..? :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
