Hello, Actually, I was wrong, the xrdp version is not the same between jessie-backports and stretch, so it could be a bug from the stretch version.
For the moment, I use the stretch-backports version, but I must install it manually since libapt (in Python3) does not allow installation from backports (well, exactly, I can't find yet a simple way to do this). -- Gilles Émilien MOREL <cont...@gilles-morel.fr> « On dit que pétrir, c'est modeler, moi je dis que péter, c'est démolir. » -- Mc Salò ----- Message original ---------------- Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> à Gilles MOREL <cont...@gilles-morel.fr>, 879...@bugs.debian.org le jeudi 07 décembre 2017 à 22:47:49 +0100 avec Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Re: Bug#879093: Segfault in libc6 while using xrdp-sesman on Stretch --------------------------------------------------- control: reassign -1 xrdp Hi, On 2017-10-19 11:38, Gilles MOREL wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.24-11+deb9u1 > > I installed xrdp on one of my servers on Debian Stretch. Some users connect > to these desktops. > When I have at least two connected users, when one of them close the session, > this happens in the kernel log : > xrdp-sesman[1006]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f1c4e6aa646 sp 00007ffc0ce9f918 > error 4 in libc-2.24.so[7f1c4e62a000+195000] This points to the strlen function. It's obviously called with a wrong argument, as otherwise many other things would be broken. On 2017-10-24 15:52, Gilles MOREL wrote: > Actually, I don't think that the problem comes from xrdp-sesman because the > one I used on Jessie (from jessie-backports) is the same as the one I use on > Stretch. For me, only the libc6 version changed, but I can be wrong about it… It's the same version of xrdp-sesman, but the following librairies changed: - libc6 (as you said) - libpam0g - libaudit1 - libcap-ng I therefore really believe it's a bug in xrdp-sesman, probably triggered by a change of one of the libraries it depends on. I am therefore reassigning the bug to xrdp. Note that there is a backport available for Stretch, it might be worth trying it. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
