Hi,

Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> (2017-11-23):
> I don't see the point in caching an userspace library header.

OK, thanks. I wasn't sure this header was to be considered a library or a
kernel(like) header… I might drop it entirely if I have to perform extra
uploads.

Alexander, are you planning on catching up with upstream during the buster
release cycle, or would a call for help be welcome?

> By doing that you are exposed to this kind of bugs.
> I guess it's OK to cache kernel headers, since these are supposed to
> not introduce breaking changes. Perhaps you could send a patch upstream
> to drop the embedded copy.

FWIW: Upstream has seen many updates since then, since 4.9 is way behind
4.14; that's why I didn't try to cherry-pick a fix from upstream.


Thanks for your feedback.
-- 
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to