On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 07:07:45PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > Why do you want to replace krb5-config with pkg-config? > That seems like a good option if we can sell upstream on the idea, but > something requiring more thought otherwise.
I believe we can consider upstream sold. pkg-config is the de facto standard for how to do this sort of thing, and there is no need for krb5 to be its own special snowflake anymore. pkg-config also gives more reasonable behavior with private libraries and static linking, if I remember correctly. -Ben
