On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:15:31AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15 2017, James McCoy wrote: > > > One thing I'd like to note is that none of the vim-$lang virtual > > packages are currently listed in Policy's set of virtual packages. > > That was an oversight on the Vim maintainers side when the package > > names were introduced, but maybe now would be a good time to correct > > that. > > The point of listing virtual packages in Policy is to deal with > disparate people maintaining packages that Provide the virtual package. > If the people using the virtual packages are part of a tightly-knit > packaging team, they can maintain the virtual packages themselves, > without listing them in Policy.
Ok. I had a recollection of that. > In light of this, could you confirm that this needs to go into Policy? > I am not familiar with you Vim guys, what with being the co-maintainer > of a dh_* tool for Emacs addons.. I don't think so. Victor? Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
