Control: notfixed -1 4:4.0.2-8 Control: found -1 4:4.0.2-8 "Aaron M. Ucko" <u...@debian.org> writes:
> rdb.c:990:14: error: 'MAXPATHLEN' undeclared (first use in this function); > did you mean 'LUA_PATHSEP'? Thanks for the quick fix, Chris! Alas, it turned out not to be entirely sufficient: aof.c:239:14: error: 'MAXPATHLEN' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LUA_PATHSEP'? Could you please give the same treatment to aof.c, which has been using the same logic? Apart from that, the only other references to MAXPATHLEN or PATH_MAX I see are a handful of uses of PATH_MAX in the convenience copy of jemalloc, which you already rightly shun in favor of a separately packaged copy. Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
