On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 01:11:20PM +0000, Arthur Taylor wrote: >Please find attached a patch which goes some way to fixing this issue. >I've only tested it in my current configuration, so I don't know how >this impacts the webserver. I've had to introduce two new functions to >free structures that may be returned by the framework. Not sure how >necessary they are, as I think mostly it frees up what it gives you.
OK, looks good from here - thanks! >This library is still significantly broken. If upstream isn't planning a >version 2 this either wants fixing comprehensively by debian, >documenting with warnings in very large letters, or removing all >together. I think it would be a mistake to base a serious application on >the current version. Either that or it's actually perfectly safe and I'm >just using it 'wrong' :) To be honest, from a quick look through some more of the code, it seems that libupnp could really do with a thorough audit and code-fix session... :-( -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's no sensation to compare with this Suspended animation, A state of bliss
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
