On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:29:07AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > As s390 is no longer part of the release architecture (as far as I know) > and also that it do not exist in testing for that archtecture, this is not > a serious bug.
out of date on alpha: vnc4-common, vnc4server, xvnc4viewer (from 4.0-8)
out of date on ia64: vnc4-common, vnc4server, xvnc4viewer (from 4.0-8)
out of date on mips: vnc4-common, vnc4server, xvnc4viewer (from 4.0-8)
out of date on mipsel: vnc4-common, vnc4server, xvnc4viewer (from 4.0-8)
out of date on hppa: vnc4-common, vnc4server, xvnc4viewer (from 4.0-8) (but
hppa isn't keeping up, so nevermind)
Please don't assume that bugs reported on s390 don't apply to other
architectures. This particular build failure shows up on hppa, mips, and
mipsel as well. (the failure on alpha/ia64 is a different one.)
Also, the correct severity for a build failure on a non-release arch would
be 'important', not 'normal', please.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
