On 10/03/2017 07:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 29/09/17 22:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 09/27/2017 12:31 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 23/09/17 21:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>> Severity: normal >>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>>> Usertags: transition >>>> >>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.2. >>>> >>>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.2.1 (#866797), there is no SONAME >>>> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol >>>> changes. >>>> >>>> All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 2.2.2 from >>>> experimental as summarized below, except gazebo. >>>> >>>> gazebo (7.8.1+dfsg-1) FTBFS for some unclear reason unrelated to gdal >>>> (it FTBFS with plain unstable too): >>>> >>>> [ 88%] Built target gazebo_gui >>>> make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/gazebo-7.8.1+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu' >>>> Makefile:165: recipe for target 'all' failed >>>> >>>> >>>> libgdal-grass doesn't need a binNMU as the 2.2.2 version will be >>>> uploaded to unstable instead. liblas likewise doesn't need a binNMU, >>>> the version is experimental will be moved to unstable instead. >>>> >>>> >>>> A complication for the transition is the inability to build the gdal >>>> package on armhf, due to an issue with ca-certificates-java: >>>> >>>> Setting up ca-certificates-java (20170531+nmu1) ... >>>> Error: missing `server' JVM at >>>> `/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-armhf/jre/lib/arm/server/libjvm.so'. >>>> Please install or use the JRE or JDK that contains these missing >>>> components. >>>> >>>> But openjdk-8-jdk-headless cannot be installed because it depends on >>>> ca-certificates-java, see: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdal&arch=armhf&ver=2.2.1%2Bdfsg-2%2Bb2&stamp=1505204615&raw=0 >>> >>> That's #874276, and that's a blocker to start this. >> >> The uninstallable build dependencies are now resolved, but the >> underlying issue in the ca-certificates-java package apparently has not >> (based on reopening of the bugreport). > > This is fine now, isn't it? And since gl2ps has migrated, let's go ahead with > this.
Yes, the builds on armhf succeeded now. Thanks for the go-ahead, I've just uploaded gdal (2.2.2+dfsg-1), liblas (1.8.1-5) & libgdal-grass (2.2.2-1) to unstable. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
