Hi Nicolas, Thank you for your interest in algobox.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:34:14PM +0200, Nicolas Patrois wrote: > Package: algobox > Version: 0.9+dfsg-1+b1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: upstream Forwarding your requests to Pascal Brachet (algobox upstream author), he is in a better place to reply and/or address your requests than I am. Please note there have been some improvements in the recent upstream releases, does all your request still apply to the 1.0.2+dfsg-1 version? > The function tool is too weak: > * F1 is a function defined with a single formula. > * F2 is a function defined by a succession of tests, the first one that is > true returns a value. > It’s too simple in order to create a bit harder algorithms. At least, we > should be able to create a real function and why not, create one’s own > classes (because I see that there is a few OO syntax in Algobox). > Moreover: > * There is no operator for the power, for example ** because ^ seems already > used as the undocumented binary bitwise operator. > * There is no way to create a generalized quantile function, for example > ALGOBOX_QUANTILE(list,1,4) would give the first quartile with, why not, an > optional flag to tell if the returned value is in the list or if it is > interpoled. > * The operations on integers is not internal, pow(2,100) returns a float. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 9.0 > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable') > Architecture: i386 (i686) Regards David
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
