On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 09:24:47PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > This was while piuparts tested upgrades from sarge via etch to sid. > Looking at the postinst script in the sid version, the suffix should > be .leafnode.bak, not just plain .bak. Perhaps an older version used a > different suffix? Or perhaps it's created by a sed -i or perl -i > somewhere that I didn't see when looking.
As discussed on IRC, the current etch and sid packages don't suffer from this problem and given the name of the file I'm not convinced it's a good idea to for me to try to make the package clean up after older versions: there's too great a potential for mishap compared to the utility. Could you please add an ignore to piuparts? Versions since 1.11.3.rel-5 shouldn't suffer from this so if you can make the ignore version specific that would be great. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
