On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Tue 2017-09-19 07:18:24 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > This is one of the examples we will probably not accept, > > thanks for the prompt response, Alex. > > > but we will discuss that internally again. > > If you decide to not accept it, where do you recommend for packaging > teams to have team-specific conversations that are not specifically bug > reports? > > should we adopt non-debian channels or private mail for those > discussions? Or is there some other recommended approach? I am not exactly sure about the best proposal yet. Do you really need a mailinglist for that or would some kind of maintaineralias (via tracker) work? We are currently working on ideas. l.d.o unfortunately isn't the right place for such tiny (sorry) maintainer lists, our tools and manpower do not scale well.
One of my ideas was to improve tracker.d.o and maybe provide some (external?) service for archiving mails (similar to gmane) with hyperkitty (the mailman3 archiver). What do you think about it? Would the combination of tracker and an archiver work for you? Thanks in advance Alex
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
