On lunes, 18 de septiembre de 2017 05:37:03 -03 Chris Knadle wrote: > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer: [snip] > Hello again Lisandro. ;-)
Hi! :-) > Mumble uses SSL (and has to) and the build logs look like the current > version in Unstable is built against libssl1.1_1.1.0c-4: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mumble&arch=amd64&ver=1.2.18-> > 1&stamp=1485106520&raw=0 > > So that looks to me like mumble is built against OpenSSL 1.1, AFAIK. It build-depends upon libssl-dev, so yes. > There has been some discussion in the #mumble IRC channel on Freenode > that Qt5 currently doesn't support OpenSSL 1.1, Exactly as Qt4 does. > but I did some digging > and it looks like it does as of Qt 5.10.0 Alpha: > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-52905 Right. > There's a commit listed there for the fix, so I suppose it may be > possible to backport a patch for Qt 5.7. Qt 5.7 is only available in stable, so no, it won't get a backport. Buster on the other hand will have Qt 5.10. > And if all goes well, Qt 5.10 and mumble-1.3.x will both have stable > releases in time to upload them to Unstable before the freeze for > Buster. [Freeze sometime ~Jan 2019, I guess.] I think either you or me are missing a point here. Right now both qt4 and qt5 use OpenSSL 1.0. So if mumbles uses OpenSSL 1.1 then it means that it is not using Qt5's Network submodule, so it's not mixing OpenSSL versions (and if it is, it has been lucky enough to avoid crashes). If this is the case then there is nothing sotpping mumble from being ported to Qt5. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better'. So I installed Linux. Anonymous Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
