Package: angband-doc Version: 3.0.3.6 Severity: normal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Hi Manoj, Licensing of angband-doc is listed as being Artistic 1.0, with you as copyright holder. Free Software Foundation raises concerns that Artistic 1.0 is too vague, and therefore does not consider that a Free license. Possibly Debian is ok with it (I didn't check) but still, if you don't mind, it seems better if you could relicense this work to use another more generally relied upon license - e.g. Artistic 2.0 which I believe is written in same spirit but has improved the phrases which Free Software Foundation raised concerns about. Therefore: Please consider relicensing, e.g. to Artistic 2.0. I ran into this issue while working for PureOS, a derivative of Debian which aims to stay close to Debian but also be endorsed by FSF as "Free" by their slightly different rules: https://tracker.pureos.net/T71 Kind regards, - Jonas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAlmxP+sACgkQLHwxRsGg ASG5XA//cS2FPHQO9u0d6qa3Wz0tILh1TyYCiT7mEbzEH7PRImdKVGlVOIvzs19w WV+uB6Jb4s16LgnkE0VrzabjetGouxvmCKoALIE4qc1zA6Ox9lb+pmaa/CpdcaNS Aw431NfM9suJyvFMVBghwRffljP3bvHsUf7+l4RXuxFkpXZiw9ChTJPj5wJAHNMH tJJxLd/FQ00FB2tK5rWLT9XGqVQyHDrOyaTAFHrJbiQ9QHQtIaA3bS+9c3UM8D2e 4V344HVrOLI3RRJYt1+c24nU92FpGphTPPWLiZKiKwIrjzz3gK2WNWMOyLzVLSk0 1jU/5xSH+Me2IIUYH8Bw2zQBfqFJZ2k0wR6jLoYtwVqBua3cxPMSB07V5viRTT19 M9VnD8qT6+/Zn2ZTemsrJiH8b8UUZSyDRwK9sDTPmu0hMeJIJMd7bHT5T6NonlIQ s227MW7GeYjFLDSq0Ge1dudX5kMwzeGC9C7f73rTH6wugH5St9XxS9tCbDcUQKEl 7imlDd9qYin925VOWGX2Su4+UxLt/W7atOzZu8kVljc/aBlLghpxCeVJZD06Wnrj 1e+FHU6k5puN0lh+JcItsHxfw1o/UavzybOkfScN3WjiSm+R7fqOrjO02KHFEHvi FU706N8/pohQua4+ZhFdR1VkWJlt7jvK6EUy+ibubyWP1tFelZ4= =1C5Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
