Hi Fritz, Fritz Reichwald wrote: > At the moment I'm waiting for someone to sponsor the package.
Still on my todo list, yes. > the status of packaging can be found here: > https://github.com/fiete201/qutebrowser-debian Hrm, is it on purpose that this git repo only contains the debian directory? Doing so was common back in the Subversion days, but nowadays, I'd expect the unpacked upstream tar ball in there, too. Anyway, that's no blocker, just unexpected. I nevertheless just had a look at this git repo and it seems to miss one file which were in your earlier packages (0.9.0-1 and 0.10.1-2). Namely the debian/source/ directory with its sole file debian/source/format is missing. Lintian also argues about it: I: qutebrowser source: missing-debian-source-format Please re-add that directory. Additionally please take a look at I: qutebrowser source: missing-debian-source-format Upstream now provides GPG signatures so we should verify them. Further, it's no more necessary to list the full text of the MPL 1.1 since Debian Policy 4.0.0 as the license text of the MPL 1.1 is now available under /usr/share/common-licenses/MPL-1.1. Please just refer to that file. (Yes, I know, I very likely argued about adding MPL-1.1 to debian/copyright in an earlier review — but the inclusion of the MPL happened only very recently. :-) Not immediately necessary, but should happen sooner or later: Debian Policy 4.1.0 is out. It also explicitly recommends adding support for verifying upstream PGP signatures. And JFTR: I just uploaded the pypeg2 package (c.f. https://bugs.debian.org/832937) so soon all runtime dependencies of qutebrowser should be available in Debian unstable. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
