On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:10:00AM +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >>There still is this other box in another workgroup however, where I also > >>installed those packages I made without the FHS patch to see if it would > >>solve the problem there. Even without the FHS patch, the workgroup that > >>box is master browser for, you never guess, only shows the master > >>browser. It had no problems with 3.0.20b-4. In addition, I reinstalled > >>the Debian Samba packages on this box too now (after dpkg --purge), > >>however the problem persists. Any advice welcome here...
> >When you say "master browser", do you mean domain master browser or local > >master browser? How do you have the machine configured, and how have you > >verified that it is the master browser? > Not sure, the machine is configured both as LMB and DMB. > The config file contains these lines: > domain master = yes > local master = yes > preferred master = yes What's the rest of the smb.conf? In particular, what are the values of "interfaces" and "wins server"? > How do I verify; log.nmbd shows: > Samba server GATEWAY-CO is now a domain master browser for workgroup > LAPINET on subnet 192.168.1.254 > and > Samba name server GATEWAY-CO is now a local master browser for workgroup > LAPINET on subnet 192.168.1.254 This shows that the machine has successfully become a DMB and an LMB, yes. > >>In my network, there is yet another Debian Sid box, which is still > >>running Samba 3.0.20b-2. I'm quite confident that this box will show the > >>same problem if I do an apt-get (dist-)upgrade on it. I'm not trying it > >>however, as I've noticed there aren't any Debian Samba packages > >>available anymore < 3.0.21a (except those for Sarge ofcourse). If > >>someone can supply me with Debian Samba packages version 3.0.20b-4 > >>however (the version I'm sure that did not show this problem), I will be > >>happy to do the test on this box, and mail you the results. > >You should be able to get previous samba package versions from > ><http://snapshot.debian.net/>. > Great, thanks! I'll try and upgrade the machine that is still running > 3.0.20b-2, will let you know what happens if I do that. > >>If the output from ls -l ... output is still wanted, please let me know > >>from which box(es) you would like to have it. > >If you have a box that is running unmodified Debian packages and is showing > >this workgroup problem, yes, I still want the ls -l output along with the > >version number of the samba package you have installed. > OK, here we go (this is from the machine where I got the pieces from > log.nmbd earlier in this mail): Ok. And the GATEWAY-CO machine is currently showing the problem? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # ls -l /var/cache/samba/ > total 8 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1051 Feb 15 02:39 browse.dat > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 15 00:44 printing > If you need more info regarding the configuration or ... Let me know. Can you also forward the contents of /var/cache/samba/browse.dat from this machine? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
