On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 08:42:16AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: [...] > So what I am currently thinking might be a viable first step is to > split out the translations for e2fsprogs and transition from > Essential: yes to Essential: no, since there is no controversy over > that step. We can then decide whether or not it's worthwhile to try > to make the Priority: required -> Priority -> important transition > during Buster or not. > > Sounds fair?
Yes! Thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for any confusion. Looking forward to see your changes uploaded in hopefully not too distant future. If you don't, I'll likely soon start the debian-devel discussion about more minbase packages splitting their locales out and see what people think about it and see if we can attract the attention of atleast the top savings package maintainers. Regards, Andreas Henriksson
