"Pawel Wiecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 14, 4:28pm, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > OTOH, I seriously wonder why the maintainer didn't react on this one,
> > one way or another.
>
> Well, what sort of reacion do you expect? I'm about to upload 1.5a56 with some
> bugfixes backported from current deb version.
What is your intention with this attempt?
The current release is 1.5a70 and a71 will come up shortly.
If Debian really goes this way, it seems that I need to make public that
Debian is anti-social and supporting people who like to infringe the copyright
and license.
Note: the CDDL clearly is a license that follows the rules from Debian.
If you believe otherwise, tell me exactly _what_ you don't like and _why_ the
CDDL is not following Debians rules.
Note-2: While the CDDL is OK, the current GPLv3 draft is definitely
allowing discriminaton and for this reason not DSFG compliant.
Let us wait what whether Debian will accept a GPLv3 licensed project......
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
